| Learning&Technology | Research | - | |
| Help | Orientation [Support] Lesson | Practice | - |
Abbott, M., Walton, C., Tapia, Y., & Greenwood, C. R. (1999). Research to practice: A "blueprint" for closing the gap in local schools. Exceptional Children, 65(3), 339-352.
Advanced Distributed Learning Network. (2000). SCORM: About sharable courseware object reference model. [Online]. Retrieved December 1, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://www.adlnet.org/communities/Scorm/background.cfm
Alliance NCSA. (2000, Summer). Enabling research using computing, grid, and web technologies. [National Computational Science Alliance (NCSA) and National Center for Supercomputing Applications (NCSA), University of Illinois, Champaign-Urbana, IL.] Access, 13(2), pp. 1-33.
American Educational Research Association. (1999, August-September). Gorillas in our midst: Emerging themes on how to improve education research. AERA-Net: The Education & Research Network. [On Capitol Hill: AERA-Analysis]. Washington, DC: Author. [Online]. Retrieved February 24, 2001, from the World Wide Web: http://www.aera.net/gov/rpn/n-06.htm
American Educational Research Association. (2000, July). The AERA position statement concerning high-stakes testing in preK-12 education. AERA-Net: The Education & Research Network. Washington, DC: Author. [Online]. Retrieved February 24, 2001, from the World Wide Web: http://www.aera.net/gov/rpn/n-06.htm
Berliner, D. C., & Biddle, B. J. (1995). The manufactured crisis: Myths, fraud, and the attack on American public schools. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (1999/2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. [Online]. Retrieved February 24, 2001, from the World Wide Web: http://www.NAP.edu
Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2000). The social life of information. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School.
Bryant, D. P., Erin, J., Lock, R., Resta, J. E., & Allen, J. M. (1998). Infusing a teacher preparation program in learning disabilities with assistive technology. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31(1), 55-66.
Bush, V. (1945/1990). Science-The endless frontier. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation. [Online]. Retrieved December 18, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://rits.stanford.edu/siliconhistory/Bush/Bush_text.html
Chall, J. S. (2000). The academic achievement challenge: What really works in the classroom? New York: Guilford.
Collins, J. C., & Porras, J. I. (1994). Built to last: Successful habits of visionary companies. New York: HarperCollins.
Cuban, L. (1990, January). Reforming, again, again, and again. Educational Researcher, 19(1), 3-13.
Cuban, L. (1993). How teachers taught: Constancy and change in American classrooms, 1890-1990. New York: Teachers College.
Dell. (2000). Western Heights Public Schools. Dell case study. [Online]. Retrieved February 27, 2001, from the World Wide Web: www.dell.com/us/en/k12/casestudies/casestudy_westernheights.htm
Devereau, M. (2000). Future success depends on making the right strategic decisions today. Silicon Valley, CA: Institute for the Future. [Online]. Retrieved February 28, 2001, from the World Wide Web: http://www.iftf.org/index.html
Donovan, M. S., Bransford, J. D., & Pellegrino, J. W. (Eds.). (1999). How people learn: Bridging research and practice. National Research Council, Committee on Learning Research and Educational Practice, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Academy of Sciences. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. [Online]. Retrieved November 20, 2000, from the World Wide Web: www.nap.edu/books/0309065364/html/
Educating Marissa. [Online]. Retrieved November 14, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://busboy.sped.ukans.edu/~seanj/cec.1/deaf.html
Englert, C. S., Raphael, T. E., Anderson, L. M., Anthony, H. M., Stevens, D. D., & Fear, K. L. (1991). Making writing strategies and self-talk visible: Cognitive strategy instruction in writing in regular and special education classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 337-372.
Fichman, R. G., & Kemerer, C. F. (1995). The illusory diffusion of innovation: An examination of assimilation gaps. MIT Center for Information Systems Research. [Online] Retrieved November 6, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://www.pitt.edu/~ckemerer/illusory.htm
Gates, W. H. (1995). The road ahead. New York: Viking.
Gates, W. H. (1999). Business @ the speed of thought: Using a digital nervous system. New York: Time Warner.
Gersten, R., Schiller, E. P., & Vaughn, S. (2000). Contemporary special education research: Syntheses of the knowledge base on critical instructional issues. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Government-University-Industry Research Roundtable. (1992). Fateful choices: The future of the U.S. Academic research enterprise. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. [Online]. Retrieved January 29, 2001, from the World Wide Web: http://books.nap.edu/books/0309046432/html/3.html
Graham, S., & MacArthur, C. (1988). Improving learning disabled students' skills at revising essays produced on a word processor: Self-instructional strategy training. Journal of Special Education, 22, 133-152.
Greenwood, G. E., & Fillmer, H. T. (1997). Professional core cases for teacher decision making. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Griffiths, S. (Ed.). (2000). Predictions: Thirty great minds on the future. Oxford, UK: Oxford University.
Hadley, M., & Sheingold, K. (1993). Commonalities and distinctive patterns in teachers' integration of computers. American Journal of Education, 101(3), 261-315.
Hasselbring, T. S. (1997). The future of special education and the role of technology. In J. L. Paul, M. Churton, W. C. Morse, A. J. Duchnowski, B. Epanchin, P. G. Osnes, & R. L. Smith (Eds.), Special education practice: Applying the knowledge, affirming the values, and creating the future. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Havelock, R. (1969). Planning for innovation through dissemination and utilization of knowledge. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
Heubert, J. P. (2001). High-stakes testing: opportunities and risks for students of color, English-language learners, and students with disabilities. In M. Pines (Ed.), The continuing challenge: Moving the youth agenda forward (Policy Issues Monograph 00-02, Sar Levitan Center for Social Policy Studies). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University. [Online]. Retrieved February 19, 2001, from the World Wide Web: http://www.cast.org/ncac/index.cfm?=920
Heubert, J, P., & Hauser, R. (Eds.). (1999). High stakes: Testing for tracking, promotion, and graduation. (National Research Council, Committee on Appropriate Test Use). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Higgins, K., & Boone, R. (1993). Technology as a tutor, tool, and agent for reading. Journal of Special Education Technology, 12(1), 28-37.
Holzberg, C. S. (1994). Technology in special education. Technology & Learning, 14(7), 18-21.
Intel. (2000). Western Heights transforms education with generous doses of vision and technology: Intel networking case studies. [Online]. Retrieved January 26, 2001, from the World Wide Web: http://www.intel.com/network/case_studies/west_heights.htm
International Society for Technology in Education. (1998, June). National education technology standards for students. [Online]. Retrieved November 10, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://cnets.iste.org
Jones, J. (2000, October 10). Going wireless. Online Athens. [Online]. Retrieved December 8, 2000, from World Wide Web:
http://www.onlineathens.com/stories/101100/ath_1011000029.shtml
Joyce, B. R., & Showers, B. (1995). Student achievement through staff development: Fundamentals of school renewal. New York: Longman.
Kaestle, C. F. (1993). The awful reputation of educational research. Educational Researcher, 22(1), 23-31.
Kavale, K. A., & Forness, S. R. (1993). The nature of learning disabilities: Critical elements of diagnosis and classification. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Kearns, D. T. & Harvey, J. (2000). A legacy of learning: Your stake in standards and new kinds of public schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Kennedy, M. M. (1997). The connection between research and practice, Educational Researcher, 26(7), 4-12.
Kerrey, B. (Chair). (2000, December). The power of the internet for learning: Moving from promise to practice. Congressional Web-based Education Commission, Washington, DC [Online]. Retrieved January 9, 2000, from World Wide Web: http://www.whitehouse.gov/WH/EOP/OSTP
Kleinfeld, J.. (1992, April). Can cases carry pedagogical content knowledge? Yes, but we've got signs of a "Matthew Effect." Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
Lagemann, E. C. (2000). An elusive science: The troubling history of education research. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
Levin, D., & Darden, C. (1999, December). Forum on technology in education: Envisioning the future. Report Summarizing the Working Meeting held at Georgetown University, Washington, D. C., December 1-2, 1999. (Prepared for the Office of Educational Technology, U.S. Department of Education). [Online]. Retrieved on November 5, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://www.air.org/forum/96etplan.pdf
Lewis, R. B. (1993). Special education technology: Classroom applications. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Linn, R. L. (2000, March). Assessments and accountability. Educational Researcher. 29(2), 4-16.
Lionni, L. (1970), Fish is Fish. New York: Scholastic.
Lyon, G. R. (1994). Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities: New views on measurement issues. [Human Learning and Behavior Branch, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland] Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
MacArthur, C. A., & Graham, S. (1987). Learning disabled students' composing under three methods of text production: Handwriting, word processing, and dictation. Journal of Special Education, 21(3), 22-42.
MacArthur, C., Graham, S., & Schwartz, S. (1991). A model for writing instruction: Integrating word processing and strategy instruction into a process approach to writing. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 6, 230-236.
MacArthur, C., Graham, S., & Schwartz, S. (1993). Integrating strategy instruction and word processing into a process approach to writing instruction. School Psychology Review, 22(4), 671-681.
Male, M. (1994). Technology for inclusion: Meeting the special needs of all students (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Malouf, D. B., & Schiller, E. P. (1995). Practice and research in special education. Exceptional Children, 61, 414-424.
Mandlebaum, L. H. (1998). Hadley the hippo loves to hop. Bowling Green, OH: Department of Special Education.
Mandlebaum, L. H. (1999). Directions for developing an instructional reading packet using Microsoft Word 98 for Macintosh computers. [Online]. Retrieved November 14, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://busboy.sped.ukans.edu/~seanj/hadley/hadley.pdf
Mathematical Sciences Education Board. (2001). Knowing and learning mathematics for teaching: Proceedings of a workshop. (Mathematics Teacher Preparation Content, Center for Education, National Research Council). Washington, DC: National Academy Press. [Online]. Retrieved March 7, 2001, from the World Wide Web: http://books.nap.edu/books/0309072522/html/R1.html
Miller , D. W. (1999, August). The black hole of educational research: Why do academic studies play such a minimal role in efforts to improve the schools? Chronicle of Higher Education, XLV(48), A17-A18.
National Academy of Education (NAE). (1999, March). Recommendations regarding research priorities: An advisory report to the National Educational Research Policy and Priorities Board. A. L. Brown & J. G. Greeno (Co-Principal Investigators), in NAE study submitted to the Office of Educational Research and Improvements (OERI), U.S. Department of Education). Washington, D.C.: Author. [Online]. Retrieved January 5, 2001, from the World Wide Web: http://www.nae.nyu.edu/pubs/reportfinal399.doc
National Academy of Sciences & the National Academy of Engineering. (1995). Reinventing schools: The technology is now. [Online] Retrieved December 20, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://www.nap.edu/readingroom/books/techgap/navigate.cgi
National Clearinghouse for Comprehensive School Reform (NCCSR). (2000, April). Comprehensive school reform implementation: What are model developers learning? Washington, DC: Author. [Online]. Retrieved 3/2/01 from the World Wide Web: http://www.goodschools.gwu.edu
National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). The nation at risk: The imperatives for educational reform. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education (1997). Technology and the new professional teacher: Preparing for the 21st century classroom. Author: Washington, DC.
National Research Council. (1992). Research and education reform: Roles for the Office of Educational Research and Improvements (OERI). Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
Office of Technology Assessment. (1995). Teachers and technology making the connection. Washington, DC: U.S. Congress, Author. [Online]. Retrieved November 14, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://www.wws.princeton.edu:80/~ota/disk1/1995/9541_n.html
O’Neill, L. (2000). Moving toward the vision of the universally designed classroom. Exceptional Parent, 30(9), 52-56. [Online]. Retrieved March 5, 2001, from the World Wide Web: http://www.cast.org/udl/index.cfm?I=114
Palincsar A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction 1, 117-175.
Parrish, T. B. (1997). The future of special education finance. In J. L. Paul, M. Churton, W. C. Morse, A. J. Duchnowski, B. Epanchin, P. G. Osnes, & R. L. Smith (Eds.), Special education practice: Applying the knowledge, affirming the values, and creating the future. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Ravitch, D. (1983). The troubled crusade: American education, 1945-1980. New York: Basic Books.
Ravitch, D. (2000). Left back: A century of failed school reforms. Riverside, NJ: Simon & Schuster.
Riley, R. W. (2000, September). The secretary’s conference on educational technology 2000. Washington, D.C. [Online]. Retrieved December 17, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://www.ed.gov/Technology/techconf/2000/agenda.html
Roblyer, M. D. (2000). The National Educational Technology Standards (NETS): A review of definitions, implication, and strategies for integrating NETS into K-12 curriculum. International Journal of Instructional Media, 27(2), 133-146.
Roblyer, M. D., & Edwards, J. (1999). Integrating technology into teaching (2nd edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Rockman, S. (1998). Leader’s guide to education technology. Edvancenet c/o National School Boards Association, Alexandria, VA. [Online]. Retrieved December 8, 2000, from the World Wide Web: www.edvancenet.org
Rohde, G. L, & Shapiro, R. (2000, October). Falling thought the net: Toward digital inclusion: A report on Americans’ access to technology tools. [4th report in a series of studies, Falling through the net.]. Economic and Statistical Administration and the National Telecommunications and Information Administration, U. S. Department of Commerce. Washington, D.C. [Online]. Retrieved December 23, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://www.ed.gov/Technology/digdiv.html
Rose, D., & Meyer, A. (2000). The future in the margins: The role of technology and disability in educational reform. [Online]. Retrieved March 5, 2001, from the World Wide Web: http://www.cast.org/udl/index.cfm?I=114
Rose, D., Sethuraman, S., & Meo, G. (2000). Universal design for learning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15(2), 56-60. [Online]. Retrieved March 5, 2001, from the World Wide Web: http://www.cast.org/udl/index.cfm?I=114
Russell, T. L. (1999). The no significant difference phenomenon: As reported in 355 research reports, summaries, and papers. (Hill & Hill Special Collections). Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University.
Schiller, E. P., & Malouf, D. B. (2000). Research syntheses: Implications for research and practice. In R. Gersten, El P. Schiller, & S. Vaughn (Eds.), Contemporary special education research: Syntheses of the knowledge base on critical instructional issues. Mahwah, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1991). On mathematics as sense making: An informal attack on the unfortunate divorce of formal and informal mathematics. In J. F. Voss, D. N. Perkins, & J.W. Segal (Eds.), Informal reasoning and education (pp. 331-343). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Schofield, J. W. (1995). Computers and classroom culture. New York: Cambridge University.
Shaw, D. E. (Chair) (1997, March). Report to the President on the use of technology to strengthen K-12 education in the United States: Educational technology initiative. (President’s Committee of Advisors on Science and Technology, Panel on Educational Technology). Washington, DC. [Online]. Retrieved December 8, 2000, from World Wide Web: http://www.whitehouse.gov/WH/EOP/OSTP/NSTC/PCAST/k-12ed.html
Sheingold, K. (1991). Restructuring for learning with technology: The potential for synergy. Phi Delta Kappa, 73(1), 17-27.
Shulman, J. (1992, April). Tender feelings, hidden thoughts: Confronting bias, innocence, and racism through case discussions. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
Simon, H. A. (1996). Observations on the sciences of science learning. Paper prepared for the Committee on Developments in the Science of Leaning for the Sciences of Science Learning, (An Interdisciplinary Discussion of Department of Psychology). Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University.
Smerdon, B., & Cronen, S. (2000, September). Teachers’ tools for the 21st century: A report on teacher’s use of technology. National Center for Educational Statistics. [Online]. Retrieved February 27, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2000102
Smith, S. J., & Jordan, L. (1999). Using the world wide web to enhance graduate education for teachers of students with ADHD. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 31(6), 20-27.
Smith, S. L., Martin, K. F., & Lloyd, J. W. (1998). Preparing prospective teachers on the Web. Teaching Exceptional Children, 30(5), 60-64. [Online]. Web-version is available at:
http://busboy.sped.ukans.edu/~seanj/cec.1/technology.html
Stanovich, K. E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York: Guilford.
Stoddard, B., & MacArthur, C. A. (1993). A peer editor strategy: Guiding learning-disabled students in response and revision. Research in the Teaching of English, 27(1), 76-103.
Stokes, D. E. (1997). Pasteur’s quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Stoll, C. (1995). Silicon snake oil: Second thoughts on the information highway. New York: Doubleday.
Symonds, W. C. (2000, September 25). Wired schools: A technology revolution is about to sweep America’s classrooms. Business Week. [Online]. Retrieved January 26, 2001, from the World Wide Web:
http://www.businessweek.com:/2000/00_39/b3700114.htm?scriptFramed
Tharp, R. G., & Gallimore, R. (1988). Rousing minds to life: Teaching, learning, and schooling in social context. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University.
TopClass. (2000). [Online]. Retrieved October 30, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://www.wbtsystems.com
Topp, N. W., Mortenson, R., & Grandgenett, N. (1995). Building a technology-using faculty to facilitate technology-using teachers. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 11(3), 11-14.
Tyack, D., & Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering toward utopia: A century of public school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
U. S. Department of Education (USDE). (1993). Getting America’s students ready for the 21st century: Meeting the technology literacy challenge. Washington, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office.
U. S. Department of Education (USDE). (1996). Urban schools: The challenge of location and poverty. NCES 96-184. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
U. S. Department of Education (USDE). (2000a). U. S. Department of Education technology initiatives. [Online]. Retrieved December 12, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://www.ed.gov/Technology/
U.S. Department of Education (USDE). (2000b). Emerging priorities: Forum on the future of technology in education. Revised 5/1/00. [Online]. Retrieved 3/5/01 from the World Wide Web: http://www.air.org/forum/Issures.htm
U. S. Department of Education-Office of Educational Technology (USDE-OET). (2000a). E-Rate and the digital divide. (Report of the Office of Technology, U.S. Department of Education). [Online]. Retrieved December 17, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://ed.gov/Technology
U. S. Department of Education-Office of Educational Technology (USDE-OET). (2000b, December 15). E-Learning: Putting a world-class education at the fingertips of all children: National educational technology plan. [Online]. Retrieved on December 20, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://ed.gov/Technology
Wallace, R. C. (Chair). (1999). Improving student learning: A strategic plan for education research and its utilization. (National Research Council, Committee on a Feasibility Study for a Strategic Education Research Program, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Academy of Sciences). Washington, DC: National Academy Press. [Online]. Retrieved February 24, 2001, from the World Wide Web: http://www.NAP.edu
Walters, J. T. (1992, June). Technology in the curriculum: The inclusion solution. Paper presented at the National Forum of the Association of Independent Liberal Arts Colleges for Teacher Education, Louisville, KY.
Warschauer, M. (1998). Online learning in sociocultural context. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 29(1), 68-73.
Web Course in a Box. (2000). [Online]. Retrieved October 30, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://www.wcb.vcu.edu/wcb/menus/start.html
WebCT. (2000). [Online]. Retrieved October 30, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://www.webct.com
Wenglinsky, H. (1998, September). Does it compute? The relationship between educational technology and student achievement in mathematics. A Policy Information Report. (ETS Policy Information Center, Research Division, Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service). [Online]. Retrieved March 7, 2001, from the World Wide Web: http://www.ets.org/research/pic/technolog.html
Western Heights Independence Public School District. (1997). Western Heights 5-Year strategic technology plan. [Online]. Retrieved on February 27, 2001, from the World Wide Web: http://www.westernheights.k12.ok.us/
Wetzel, K. (1993). Models for achieving computer competencies in preservice education. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 9(4), 4-6.
Whitehead, A. N. (1929/1985). The aims of education and other essays. New York: Free Press.
Whitworth, J. (1993). Special education: An overview. ERIC Clearing House, 66(3), 132-133.
 |